Vai al contenuto principale
Oggetto:
Oggetto:

INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES ON THE TRANSITIONS: SOCIO-ECONOMICS, LAW AND BEYOND (inactive 2023/24)

Oggetto:

INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES ON THE TRANSITIONS: SOCIO-ECONOMICS, LAW AND BEYOND (inactive 2023/24)

Oggetto:

Anno accademico 2023/2024

Codice attività didattica
CPS0746A
Corso di studio
Master's Degree Course in Economic analysis and policy
Anno
2° anno
Periodo
Da definire
Tipologia
Caratterizzante
Crediti/Valenza
6
SSD attività didattica
IUS/05 - diritto dell'economia
Erogazione
Tradizionale
Lingua
Inglese
Frequenza
Facoltativa
Tipologia esame
Scritto ed orale
Tipologia unità didattica
modulo
Insegnamento integrato
COMMONT CULTURE: JOINT SEMINAR (inactive 2023/24) (CPS0746)
Oggetto:

Sommario insegnamento

Oggetto:

Obiettivi formativi

The major ecological and social crisis that Planet Earth, its territories, living environments and inhabitants are going through, makes it necessary to deal with systemic, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary issues related to the environment.
The increased sensitivity to the effects of human activities on the major balances of the biosphere, primarily climate change, the extinction of biodiversity, pollution, the considerable
pressure on natural resources and settlement dynamics, raise important political and social debates.
The major cycles such as water, carbon, nitrogen, the major telluric or climatic phenomena, energy resources, are all processes that must be rethought today in their interactions with
human activities. In this module, we will deal with different dimensions of this crisis and ways to respond to it.

Oggetto:

Risultati dell'apprendimento attesi

This course will provide students with knowledge on ecological and social crisis that Planet Earth.


Oggetto:

Programma

Indicative list of lectures

1. Introduction (Luc Abbadie et Nathalie Blanc)
2. Climate change: the Science behind the findings and projection  (Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudré)
3. What does biodiversity mean? (Luc Abbabie)
4. Ordinary environmentalisms: mobilizations and spaces (Nathalie Blanc)
5. Ecological limits & global health What is the horizon of survival for humanity? (Jean François Toussaint)
6. Politics and policy of the energy transition (Cristina Peñasco)
7. Coupling social and ecological systems: theoretical and practical issues (Rémi Beau)
8. The new challenges of “natural” disaster risk reduction in the Anthropocene (Maud Devès)
9. Agroecology (Sébastien Barot)
10. The history of IPCC and the birth of sustainability sciences (Wolfrang Cramer)
11. Rights of the Nature, rights and Nature (Olivier Clerc)
12. The science and politics of Critical Zone (Jérôme Gaillardet)
13. The planetary boundaries: an interdisciplinary and multi-scale problem (Fabien Esculier)
14. An introduction to Ocean Geopolitics (Christophe Prazuck)
15. What is environmental justice about? (Valérie Deldrève)
16. Geopolitics in (ecological) transition (Sébastien Treyer)

Oggetto:

Modalità di insegnamento

Classes will be given in English, in the form of lecture courses.

Oggetto:

Modalità di verifica dell'apprendimento

Class teaching, discussion of specific cases, role playing, student presentation.
Oral defense.
Group projects.

Oggetto:

Attività di supporto

Testi consigliati e bibliografia

Oggetto:

• IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K.
Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3−32, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.001.; https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_
WGI_SPM.pdf
• IPCC, 2019: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea,
E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.- O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)] ;
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2020/02/SPM_Updated-Jan20.pdf
• Barot S., Abbadie L., Auclerc A., Barthelemy C., Berille E., Billet P., Clergeau P., Consales J.N., Deschamp-Cottin M., David A., Devigne C., Dharn V., Dusza Y., Gaillard A., Gonzalez E., Hedont M., Labarraque D., Le Bastard A.M., Morel J.L., Petit-Berghem Y., Rémy E., RochellNewall E., Veyrières Y. 2019. Urban ecology, stakeholders and the future of ecology. Science of the Total Environment 667: 475-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.410
• Barot S., Ye L., Abbadie L., Blouin M., Frascaria-Lacoste N., 2017. Ecosystem services must tackle anthropized ecosystems and ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering 99: 486-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.071
• McPhearson, T., Karki, M., Herzog, C., Santiago Fink, H., Abbadie, L., Kremer, P., Clark, C. M., Palmer, M. I., and Perini, K. (2018). Urban ecosystems and biodiversity. In : Rosenzweig, C., W. Solecki, P. Romero-Lankao, S. Mehrotra, S. Dhakal, and S. Ali Ibrahim (eds.), Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge University Press, New
York. 257-;318
• Loftus, A., 2012, Everyday environmentalism: Creating an urban political eco logy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
• Ernstson, H., Sörling, S. (Eds), 2019, Grounding urban natures: histories and futures of urban ecologies, Cambridge, MIT Press.
• Schlosberg, D., Coles, R., 2016, The new environmentalism of everyday life: Sustainability, material flows and movements, Contemporary Political Theory 15(2), 160-181.
L’homme peut-il s’adapter à lui-même ? Toussaint JF, Bernard
Swynghedauw, Gilles Boeuf. Éditions QUAE, Paris 2012,
188p. https://www.quae.com/produit/1135/9782759219452/lhomme-peut-il-s-adapter-a-lui-meme
• Impacts sanitaires de la stratégie d’adaptation au changement climatique. Rapport pour le compte des Ministères chargés de la Santé et de l’Écologie. Toussaint JF. Groupe Adaptation et Prospective du Haut Conseil de la Santé Publique. Documentation Française, Paris
2015. 136p. https://www.hcsp.fr/explore.cgi/avisrapportsdomaine?clefr=5
23 & https://www.vie-publique.fr/catalogue/22617-impactssanitaires-de-la-strategie-dadaptation-au-changement-climatique
• De Larochelambert Q, Marc A, Antero J, Le Bourg E, Toussaint JF. Covid-19 mortality: a matter of vulnerability among nations facing limited margins of adaptation. Front Public Health, 2020; 8: 604339. Doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604339 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.604339/full
• Are we reaching the limits of Homo sapiens? Adrien Marck, Antero J, Berthelot G, Saulière G, Jancovici JM, Masson-Delmotte V, Boeuf G, Spedding M, Le Bourg E, Toussaint JF. Front Physiol. 2017, 8: 812. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00812. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10. 3389/fphys.2017.00812/full
• Overland, I., Bazilian, M., Uulu, T. I., Vakulchuk, R., & Westphal, K. (2019). The GeGaLo index: Geopolitical gains and losses after energy transition. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100406.
• Stephenson, J. R., Sovacool, B. K., & Inderberg, T. H. J. (2021). Energy cultures and national decarbonisation pathways. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110592.
•Breetz, H., Mildenberger, M. and Stokes, L. (2018). The political logics of clean energy transitions. Business and Politics Vol. 20, Pages 492- 522.
• Vakulchuk, R., Overland, I., & Scholten, D. (2020). Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 122, 109547.
• Costanza R., Arge R. (d’), Groot R. (de), Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, May, 387 : 253-260.
• Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches from Here and There. Oxford University Press, New York.
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
• Nesshöver C. et al. 2017. The science, policy and practice of naturebased solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Sci. Tot. Environ. 579, 1215-;1227.
• Beck, U. 1999. World risk society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
• Cutter, S. L. (2020). The changing nature of hazard and disaster risk
in the Anthropocene. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-9.
• Gliessman, S. R. 2006. Agroecology: the ecology of sustainable food systems. Second edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
• Altieri, M. A. 1989. Agroecology - a new research and development paradigm for world agriculture. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 27:37-46.
• Malézieux, E. 2012. Designing cropping systems from nature. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32:15-29.
• Doré, T., D. Makowski, E. Malézieux, N. Munier-Jolain, M. Tchamitchian, and P. Tittonell. 2011. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy 34:197-210.
• Compagnon D, Cramer W 2016 The IPCC experience and lessons for IPBES. In: Hrabanski M, Pesche D The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) - Meeting the challenges of biodiversity and governance. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 119-134. (en PJ)
• IPCC, 2022: Summary for Policymakers [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem (eds.)]. In: Climate Change
2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S.
Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3-;33, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.001 (<https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf>)
• Kemp L, Xu C, Depledge J, Ebie KL, Gibbins G, Kohler TA, Rockström J, Scheffer M, Schellnhuber HJ, Steffen W, Lenton TM 2022 Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climatechange scenarios. PNAS 119(34), e2108146119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119
(<https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.2108146119>)
• Boyd, D., "Recognizing the rights of nature. Lofty rhetoric or legal revolution?", Natural resources & environment, 03/2018, pp. 13-17.
• Krämer, L., "Rights of nature and their implementation", Journal for European Environmental Planning Law (JEEPL), 2020, pp. 47-75.
• Stone, C., "Should Trees Have Standing?-;Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects", Southern California Law Review, 1972, pp. 450-501.
• Warnock, M., "Should trees have standing? In Should trees have standing: 40 years on?", Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 2012, pp. 56-67
• Arènes, A., Latour, B., & Gaillardet, J. (2018). Giving depth to the surface: An exercise in the Gaia-graphy of critical zones. The Anthropocene Review, 5(2), 120-135.
• Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (Eds.). (2020). Critical zones: observatories for earthly politics. MIT Press.
• Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., Cornell, S.E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G.M., Persson, L.M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., Sorlin, S., 2015. Planetary boundaries:
Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
• O’Neill, D., Fanning, A., Lamb, W. and Steinberger, J., 2018. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), pp.88-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
• https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetaryboundaries.html
• Hervé Coutau Bégarie (2008), “La nouvelle stratégie navale”, Stratégique, n°89-90.
• Hervé Coutau Bégarie 2002, “L’aventure de la géopolitique”, Relations internationals, N°109.
•Martin Motte (2018), La mesure de la force, Tallandier.
• Christophe Prazuck (2021), “Tensions maritimes en Méditerranée orientale”, La revue des deux mondes, Mars.
• James Stravidis (2017), The geopolitics of the world’s oceans, Penguin Press.
• Ian Urbina (2019), The Outlaw Ocean, Knopf.
• Websites:
• https://www.oce.global/en/resources/climate-science/ipcc-specialreport-ocean-and-cryosphere-changing-climate-summary
• https://www.ifri.org/fr/publications/editoriaux-de-lifri/lettrecentre-asie/mer-de-chine-droit-de-mer-paradoxe-chinois
• Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016). Trends and
directions in environmental justice: from inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 321-340.
• Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality, San Francisco, Westwiewpress Boulder.
• Coolsaet, B. (Ed.). (2020). Environmental justice: key issues. Routledge.
• Deldrève, V. (2015). Pour une sociologie des inégalités environnementales, Bruxelles, Peter Lang.
• Deldrève, V. (2022). Constructing an Environmental Justice Framework for the Analysis of Environmental Inequalities. In Where Has Social Justice Gone? (pp. 129-144). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• Martinez-Alier, J. (2003). The Environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental politics, 22(1), 37-55
• Taylor, D. E. (2000). The Rise of Environmental Justice Paradigm. Injustice framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses. American Behavioral Scientist 43(4): 508-580



 




Oggetto:

Note

Oggetto:
Ultimo aggiornamento: 27/09/2023 14:04
Location: https://www.didattica-cps.unito.it/robots.html
Non cliccare qui!